Case study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 48

Case Study ExampleThere are similarities between the two leaders. They both support communication that is critical to any organizations success. Problems can be detected unfluctuating and allow decision makers to execute as illustrated in the transmit sending a message ratting the other party. In Semco giving opinions on opportunities and advancements gave room for participation and involvement to workers.Creativity and innovation was in any case a great mover of the two. Giving opportunities to both teams gave them a chance to exploit new slipway of carrying out their respective duties. In Michaels ship idea, the young were well trained but they did not have a room for improvement. However, practicing discipline without formalism made them generate new ideas. It was amazing to check what it brought to the firm through removing bureaucratic system and empowering the workers.Flexibility, respect, dignity and maintaining quality of life drove the firms to success. In Semco, they c ould pack the times for their respective duties, how to dress that motivated them. Offering responsibility and not orders, devotion changed the ship trading operationsHowever, the two differ in relation to their organizational philosophy where in the beginning Semler viewed an autocratic leading style but later came to adapt a democratic style. Michael was involved knowing every crewmember of the ship and better understood their problems and see how he could improve their lives. On the other hand, Semlers leadership was in the first place concentrated on performance and strategies. He, however, was forced by circumstances in the end to listen to workers since they were the tugboat to the firm.Change was essential Michaels ship was mainly changed through direct involvement of the young crewmembers saving their ideas on board while Semco change came because of economic cycles and the firm had to do something to save its